Close Menu
    What's Hot

    Trump–Musk feud becomes memecoin meta, leads to surge in trading volume

    Watch Out For These Levels If Bitcoin Price Returns To $100K: Blockchain Firm

    XRP Price Risks Plummeting Below $2 As Sellers Take Control

    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    MarketsNews.co.uk
    • Live Chart
    • Brokers
    • Scam Broker
    • Reviews
    • Tools
      • Lot Size Calculator
      • Margin Calculator
      • PIPS Calculator
      • Profit & loss calculator
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Start Trading
    Trending Topics:
    • Markets
    • Stocks
    • Cryptocurrency
    • Forex
    • Scam Broker
    MarketsNews.co.uk
    • Markets
    • Stocks
    • Cryptocurrency
    • Forex
    • Scam Broker
    Markets

    Rachel Reeves paves way for capital spending increase

    Anthony M. OrbisonBy Anthony M. OrbisonSeptember 23, 2024No Comments4 Mins Read
    Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest Copy Link Telegram LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Rachel Reeves paves way for capital spending increase.com2F  origami2Fservice2Fimage2Fv22Fimages2Fraw2Fhttps253A252F252Fd1e
    Rachel Reeves paves way for capital spending increase.com2F origami2Fservice2Fimage2Fv22Fimages2Fraw2Fhttps253A252F252Fd1e
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

    Roula Khalaf, Editor of the FT, selects her favourite stories in this weekly newsletter.

    UK chancellor Rachel Reeves has paved the way for higher government capital spending, fuelling the debate over the future of her borrowing rules, declaring: “Growth is the challenge and investment is the solution.”

    Reeves told the Labour party conference on Monday that her Budget would herald “an end to the low investment that feeds decline”, with government insiders confirming she wanted to ensure her fiscal rules did not block vital capital spending.

    The chancellor, speaking in Liverpool, struck a more optimistic note on the future of the British economy after criticism that she had been too gloomy, as she insisted a Labour government would invest to grow the economy.

    “It is time the Treasury moved on from just counting the costs of investment in our economy to recognising the benefits too,” she said. Aides said she wanted to change the culture inside the Treasury.

    But a debate is now under way in the government on whether Reeves’s fiscal rules should be amended to allow more capital spending. She has said she will give more details in the Budget next month.

    Labour has pledged to follow two key fiscal rules: to balance the current budget, which excludes investment, and to bring down government net debt as a share of GDP between the fourth and fifth year of its forecast.

    Reeves’s decision to shift to the current budget rule, announced before the election, was explicitly meant to create fresh space for investment. But she remains heavily constrained by the debt rule.

    In a letter to the Financial Times this month, economists including Lord Gus O’Donnell, a former cabinet secretary; Lord Jim O’Neill, a former Treasury minister under David Cameron; and Mariana Mazzucato, an economics professor at University College London, warned that the current debt rules were responsible for an “inbuilt bias” against investment.

    Reeves signalled in her speech that she wanted to find ways of better measuring the benefits of investment in Treasury planning, creating space for greater public spending in roads, rail and green infrastructure.

    This suggests the chancellor is interested in alternative measures of the public balance sheet’s strength.

    One broader metric is public sector net worth, which looks at a wide array of government assets and which an IMF paper argued this year is “more conducive to public investment and economic growth” than a more traditional approach.

    A spokesperson for Reeves said any change in such rules was “a matter for the Budget”.

    Tom Railton, director of the Invest in Britain campaign, said the chancellor was right to say that cuts to public investment were a false economy that damage growth and undermine fiscal sustainability.

    He added: “However, the government has inherited plans to cut public investment, driven by anti-investment fiscal rules that lock Britain into economic decline.”

    Reeves’s speech, interrupted by a protest over Labour’s stance on the war against Gaza, was an attempt to reassure business and the party’s MPs that the chancellor has an optimistic vision for the future of the economy.

    “I know you’re impatient for change and I am too,” she told her audience.

    Earlier in the day, delegates had booed a decision to delay a non-binding vote in which the leadership faces possible defeat over its plans to means test winter fuel payments.

    Reeves argued that Labour had to respond to what she characterised as a £22bn black hole left in its accounts by the previous Conservative government.

    The chancellor added that October’s Budget would have “real ambition” and that there would be no return to austerity.

    Several cabinet ministers, mayors and other senior Labour figures told the FT this weekend that the party leadership had been far too “gloomy” and “downbeat” in its first two months in power.

    “This budget will be a budget for economic growth; it will be a budget for investment,” the chancellor said. “My ambition knows no limits, because I can see the prize on offer if we make the right choices now.”

    In another remark highlighting the role of the state, she said: “Government cannot just get out of the way and leave markets to their own devices.”

    The new administration could deliver “a Britain of opportunity, fairness and enterprise” despite the fiscal challenges it faced, she said.

    Reeves announced an accelerated timeline on the party’s pledge to roll out free breakfast clubs to every primary school in the UK, saying it will start in hundreds of schools from April 2025, ahead of the national rollout. An extra £7mn would be spent on a “pilot project”.

    This would mark “an investment so that, in years to come, we can proudly say that we left behind a Britain where the next generation has a chance to do better than those who came before it”, she said.

    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email Copy Link
    Previous ArticleQualcomm’s potential Intel buyout could raise antitrust, foundry concerns By Reuters
    Next Article Fractal Bitcoin: A Misleading Affinity
    Anthony M. Orbison
    • Website

    Related Posts

    Where Analysts Think Bitcoin is Headed in 2025

    December 23, 2024

    Fed says it is weighing changes to bank tests for systemic risk

    December 23, 2024

    Housing crisis: Mobile home prices soar faster than single-family homes

    December 23, 2024
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Amazon.com, Inc.
    $213.57
    $5.66
    2.72%
    Meta Platforms, Inc.
    $697.71
    $13.09
    1.91%
    S&P 500
    $6,000.36
    $61.06
    1.03%
    Alphabet Inc.
    $174.92
    $5.11
    3.01%
    EUR/USD
    $1.14
    $0.0056
    0.49%
    EUR/JPY
    $165.05
    $0.774
    0.47%
    USD/CAD
    $1.37
    $0.0019
    0.14%

    Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
    Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
    Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
    It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
    Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
    We're social. Connect with us:

    Facebook X (Twitter)
    • Home
    • About us
    • Contact
    • Disclaimer
    • Privacy Policy
    © 2025 Marketsnews.co.uk

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.