Close Menu
    What's Hot

    Solana indicators point north, bulls test $165 target

    Trump–Musk feud becomes memecoin meta, leads to surge in trading volume

    Watch Out For These Levels If Bitcoin Price Returns To $100K: Blockchain Firm

    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    MarketsNews.co.uk
    • Live Chart
    • Brokers
    • Scam Broker
    • Reviews
    • Tools
      • Lot Size Calculator
      • Margin Calculator
      • PIPS Calculator
      • Profit & loss calculator
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Start Trading
    Trending Topics:
    • Markets
    • Stocks
    • Cryptocurrency
    • Forex
    • Scam Broker
    MarketsNews.co.uk
    • Markets
    • Stocks
    • Cryptocurrency
    • Forex
    • Scam Broker
    Cryptocurrency

    The Unit Denomination of Bitcoin Does Not Need To Change

    Anthony M. OrbisonBy Anthony M. OrbisonDecember 18, 2024No Comments3 Mins Read
    Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest Copy Link Telegram LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    Follow Nikolaus On 𝕏 Here For Daily Posts

    Last week, long-time Bitcoiner John Carvalho introduced a new Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) aimed at addressing the unit bias issue many people face when first finding bitcoin.

    “This BIP proposes redefining the commonly recognized “bitcoin” unit so that what was previously known as the smallest indivisible unit becomes the primary reference unit,” Carvalho explains. “Under this proposal, one bitcoin is defined as that smallest unit, eliminating the need for decimal places. By making the integral unit the standard measure, this BIP aims to simplify user comprehension, reduce confusion, and align on-chain values directly with their displayed representation.”

    The display of how units of bitcoin are displayed would shift from its current state to this:

    Current: 1.00000000 BTC → New: 100000000 BTC

    Current: 0.00500000 BTC → New: 500000 BTC

    Current: 0.00010000 BTC → New: 10000 BTC

    “Historically, 1 BTC = 100,000,000 base units. Under this proposal, “1 bitcoin” equals that smallest unit,” the proposal further explained.

    I understand where Carvalho is coming from on this and I can visualize scenarios where some people may find this easier, but I think the thinking here is likely short sighted and doesn’t work in the grand scheme of things.

    Over the years I have also heard of other Bitcoiners discussing ways to combat the unit bias of Bitcoin. It seems most Bitcoiners are primarily concerned with how new users often get immediately discouraged if they cannot afford a whole bitcoin, and tend to gravitate towards buying altcoins instead where they can buy at least 1 unit of that coin.

    After acknowledging the issues he’s trying to address with this, I personally do not support this BIP. I think it would add more confusion rather than solving it. I think it is ultimately a waste of time and energy for Bitcoin developers to focus on this when there are many other things they could be working on that would add actual value to Bitcoin.

    I think Stehpan Livera has had a couple really good takes on this, pointing out how silly it would actually be in practice.

    Hey I've got this great idea! Instead of 1 pizza with 8 slices, let's just call each slice a pizza!

    Just make sure when you go to order your pizza, you now order 8 pizzas instead of 1. Otherwise the staff will get confused.

    Just my 2 pizzas.

    — Stephan Livera (@stephanlivera) December 14, 2024

    Everyone involved in Bitcoin is already accustomed to how it currently is specified, so this is not a real problem most people seem to care about. Carvalho has suggested a feature be implemented where wallets and such can toggle between the current and would-be new way of displaying the units of bitcoin, so there is a transition period where users can get used to his way of specifying units of bitcoin, but I just don’t see why it would be worth making this transition.

    It would just feel like a burden on everyone to start explaining this way and potentially slow adoption if anything.

    Good luck to the people who would rather explain "there will never be more than 2.1 quadrillion bitcoins" 😂

    — Stephan Livera (@stephanlivera) December 14, 2024

    This article is a Take. Opinions expressed are entirely the author’s and do not necessarily reflect those of BTC Inc or Bitcoin Magazine.



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email Copy Link
    Previous Article374Water appoints Russell Kline as CFO (NASDAQ:SCWO)
    Next Article US finalizes new Washington flights for Delta, United, American By Reuters
    Anthony M. Orbison
    • Website

    Related Posts

    Solana indicators point north, bulls test $165 target

    June 7, 2025

    Trump–Musk feud becomes memecoin meta, leads to surge in trading volume

    June 7, 2025

    Watch Out For These Levels If Bitcoin Price Returns To $100K: Blockchain Firm

    June 7, 2025
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Amazon.com, Inc.
    $213.57
    $5.66
    2.72%
    Meta Platforms, Inc.
    $697.71
    $13.09
    1.91%
    S&P 500
    $6,000.36
    $61.06
    1.03%
    Alphabet Inc.
    $174.92
    $5.11
    3.01%
    EUR/USD
    $1.14
    $0.0056
    0.49%
    EUR/JPY
    $165.05
    $0.774
    0.47%
    USD/CAD
    $1.37
    $0.0019
    0.14%

    Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
    Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
    Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
    It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
    Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
    We're social. Connect with us:

    Facebook X (Twitter)
    • Home
    • About us
    • Contact
    • Disclaimer
    • Privacy Policy
    © 2025 Marketsnews.co.uk

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.